o They must not have been convicted by final judgement and neither have admitted:

§ participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime,

§ corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention of the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union and Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA,

§ fraud within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention relating to the protection of the financial interests of the European Communities of 27/11/1995,

§ terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist as defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism or inciting, aiding or abetting an offence as defined in Article 4 of the aforementioned Decision,

§ money laundering or terrorist financing, as defined in Article 2 of the national laws for the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist financing Laws of 2007 - 2016,

§ child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings in accordance with Article 2 of the Law 60(I) of 2014 on the Prevention, Fighting against Trafficking in and Exploitation of Human Beings and Protection of Victims.

o They must not be bankrupt or the subject of insolvency or winding-up proceedings, their assets must not administered by a liquidator or by the court, they must not be in an arrangement with creditors, their business activities must not be suspended and they must not be in any analogous situation arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations.

o They must not be guilty of grave professional misconduct which renders their integrity questionable, as this can be demonstrated by the Competent Authority by appropriate means.

o They must not have entered into agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition, where the Contracting Authority has reasonably plausible indications to conclude so.

o They must not have a conflict of interest within the meaning of Article 6 of Law, that cannot be effectively remedied without excluding them from participation in the tender procedure.

o They must not have distorted the competition from the prior involvement in the preparation of the procurement procedure, as referred to in Article 38 of Law, unless this can be effectively remedied without excluding them from participation in the tender procedure.

o They must not have shown significant or persistent deficiencies in the performance of a substantive requirement under a prior public contract, a prior contract with a contracting entity or a prior concession contract which led to early termination of that prior contract, damages or other comparable sanctions.

o They must not be guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria, must not have withheld such information or are not able to submit the supporting documents required pursuant to Article 59 of Law,